Hi Raphael-Q,
I would also love to try Galileo HAS to evaluate if it is relieable and accurate enough for me to replace NTRIP, could you also please send me the new firmware once it is ready?
Best regards
Geno
Hi everyone.
No news on the new firmware yet?
Best regards
Hello, Quectel.
Could you please inform us about the progress of the new firmware with Galileo HAS fixes?
Can we help with anything?
We’re looking forward to it.
Best regards
Angel
1 Like
Hello.
We’re silent again from Quectel.
Today is almost August 20th, and we still have no news regarding the Galileo HAS corrections.
Can you provide us with any valid and accurate information?
Best regards
Angel
Any update on this HAS implementation?
It’s from August 12th for testing only, dispatched only yesterday…!!
Please give feedback on the Sparkfun forum as it appears on this forum that moderators are/use bots!
For enable and set fix rate to 1Hz (do not work) so U must put module as in base_mode
$PQTMCFGFIXRATE,W,1000*59 fix rate to 1Hz is mandatory but do not work!
$PQTMRESTOREPAR*13
$PQTMCFGRCVRMODE,W,2*29
$PQTMCFGMSGRATE,W,RTCM3-107X,0,0*2E
$PQTMCFGPPP,W,2,1,120,0.10,0.15*68 enable HAS PPP feature
$PQTMCFGPPP,R*74 for ask & get response
$PQTMCFGMSGRATE,W,GGA,1*0A
$PQTMSAVEPAR*5A
$PQTMSRR*4B reboot
also $PQTMGNSSSTOP*09 do not work (self restarting).
$GNGGA,130311.000,x010.57502420,N,0x525.57906583,E,5,17,1.12,278.589,M,46.132,M,11.0,9002*6B
4 Likes
1 Like
Thanks @Bamarcant.
We’ll be testing.
For now, I’m a bit frustrated, as the results aren’t very good.
I don’t know if it’s because of my small helical antenna, even though I have a clear view.
I never know if the position is actually fixed or floating.
After 25 minutes, it seems to become more stable.
It’s a very interesting start. Waiting for improvements to the calculation algorithm in new firmware.
Regards
Angel
Don’t worry, nmea 4 , 5 and 6 are not for indicate PPP (but)
the 5 forcibly indicates when PPP (have) a solution, so it is not float but PPP_HAS solution.
U must compare this solution at known points…
we should use this configuration for testing it on the beta released on sparkfun forum? which is the correct one?
they just mention ```
$PQTMCFGPPP,W,2,1
Si, praticamente questi buontemponi hanno buttato lì un fw arrangiato (menomale!) ; quindi dobbiamo
arramgiarci così come è per adesso (e funziona!), però non ti fà cambiare il fix a 1Hz e non ti fa stoppare
l’engine per controllare il debug dei comandi.
Ho fatto quindi delle prove e ho settato il modulo in modalità base (che è a 1Hz) ma bisogna spegnere rtcm
e attivare GGA poichè è l’unico indicatore della soluzione PPP anche se viene indicata con un 5 che non c’entra nulla con il protocollo nmea…(comprare i diritti della nuova versione costa troppo!)
comunque avevo acceso il modulo in casa già da 10 minuti bisticciando con i comandi e con mio grande stupore ai primi due passaggi ha sputato un bel cinque (5) subito dopo il riavvvio…
ché dire adesso bisogna provarlo sul campo; la notte scorsa non ci sono riuscito perchè ho dimenticato come si prepara il microcontrollore in “stand alone” faccio prima a riprogrammarlo daccapo , lascierò stanotte il modulo sotto le stelle su un punto noto e analizzerò i log del PPP ma anche del RTK (da remoto).
$PQTMCFGPPP,W,2,1,120,0.10,0.15*68
si può modificare ,volendo, con meno restrizioni
per vedere l’accuratezza si può lanciare il comando $PQTMSVINSTATUS come quando fai un survey, leggendo il meaning in metri sia in PPP che in RTK (GST non funziona).
Fatemi sapere, anche per capire se alcuni comandi vanno oppure è solo a me…
Question:
At some point in the future, after convergence, will the system indicate a fixed solution?
When I connect the Sparkfun Postcard RTK to my controller with Landstar 8, it quickly indicates a floating solution, but the accuracy indicated by the program is never less than 70 cm, and on the Portability Protector screen, it is never less than 1.30 m.
These are very different values.
With very clear skies,
The accuracy results compared after taking multiple data points are around 15 cm to 40 cm.
I’ll share them when I can.
If anyone can explain, I’d appreciate it.
Thanks.
Quectel people.
A firmware fix has been released for Galileo HAS.
Officially, we haven’t received much feedback or suggestions from users who have been struggling with this for months.
Would you be so kind as to give us any comments or guidance on the new firmware?
For example, why were DPI fixes released based on an older version?
We’ve lost several improvements achieved over the last year due to age.
Are there technical issues preventing this?
I’d like some clarification on fixes and floating solutions based on these Galileo HAS fixes. For now, they’re all interpreted as floating.
Do the 10 cm horizontal and 15 cm vertical restrictions, which are recommended, really restrict the internal calculation of the solution?
We look forward to your comments and are available to collaborate on improving the firmware.
Best regards
Angel
Hello friends.
After several tests with the new firmware, the LG290P is giving me data of all kinds of quality.
Now, yesterday I disabled GLONASS and BEIDOU, and it seems to be working much better.
I’ve managed to repeat two data series with values <20 CM, just as Galileo promised at 95%.
Any coincidence?
Will I be able to do it again tomorrow? I don’t know.
I’m asking if you can configure it that way and run your tests.
We’ll share the data later.
Regards
Angel
Hi @Jasper
Would you like to tell me something about my previous posts?
Regards
Angel
1 Like
Hi @Raphael-Q
Would you like to tell me something about my previous posts?
Regards
Angel
Hello, Quectel.
Any official updates on the new firmware with Galileo HAS?
I’d really appreciate your feedback on this topic.
Best regards
Hi amlago
I’m sorry to inform you that the official standard version of the PPP function is still under optimization.
Best regards
Hi @jasper
It’s clear that the Galileo HAS corrections aren’t optimized yet.
What we want to know is what stage they’re at, since we’ve been testing beta firmware versions with PPP capability for a couple of months now.
Any new and specific information on the subject?
Any date for a possible v07 with PPP capability?
Regards