Hello, I have this question about the new gps module LG290P: is it able to receive Galileo E6 HAS signals?
thanks for your attention
AF
Hello, I have this question about the new gps module LG290P: is it able to receive Galileo E6 HAS signals?
thanks for your attention
AF
I hope you get a reply from a Quectel rep to clarify, but I’ll give you my “gnss enthusiast” answer in the interim. The spec sheets and protocol references don’t have have any details yet, but the launch press release does have the following:
Future-proofing applications by supporting all constellations including GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BDS, NavIC, QZSS, as well as SBAS support (WASS, EGNOS, MSAS, and GAGAN) and advanced satellite-based signals such as PPP-B2b, CLAS (QZSS L6), Galileo HAS E6, the LG290P is a cost-effective industrial-grade module that receives L1, L2, L5 and E6 frequency bands.
So my personal take is that it is a feature that is being worked on for a future firmware release.
Hello. I would like to know where you stand on this issue? Have you managed to obtain details on this functionality?
Greetings,
I personally haven’t looked into the problem in depth.
I didn’t get any answers from the quectel technicians.
Maybe WIFELike can give you more info
LG290P supports search star as shown in the figure below, including Galileo’s E6 HAS information.
Thank you for your response george.gao. I noticed when I connected with my module that Galileo E6 was indeed present in my signal, but my survey application (MAPITGIS) was sending me precision information like SBAS. So I was wondering if the HAS correction was correctly applied, or if there was no conflict between SBAS and HAS, or perhaps it was necessary to configure HAS unless it was factory configured. I would do another test with a clearer sky, maybe that’s where it comes from.