With RTKBase, you can specify a manual base station antenna position and it will generate the RTCM3-1005 message itself. In fact, you would need to disable it from the LC29HAA
1 Like
Once know the fixed location U can set the module in ecef or lat.lon.hei e.g.
$PAIR604,1,1,40.0018246,116.2122758,49.21*06
pair command list in mega_link.
Wow, Marco, what are these secret commands from the SimCom document?! They are not documented in the Quectel documentâŚSeems like there is more to the LC29H than I realizedâŚ
E non è tutto, il chip AG3335 ha anche un sdk che Airoha non vuole concedere ai profaniâŚ
In questi giorni proverò un gemello di _HEA a meno della metĂ del prezzoâŚ
It would seem that the different companies that use the AIROHA engine choose to disclose different features for their own marketing purposesâŚ
Hehe, sounds very interesting and promising. Thanks a thousand times for sharing your knowledge and giving all those hints. I will purchase one of these boards and give it a try.
Seems to be for orange / raspi pi and primarily the ublox receiver (though its configurable) . I was hoping for a solution for ESP32, but its ok for getting into the matter using a Windows PC first. Will see.
Yes, RTKBase runs on a Linux system. I run my base station as a Linux VM on a PC and adapted it to work with Quectel modules. I have also used esp32 Xbee solutions, but found those to be less reliable.
1 Like
SĂ, entiendo lo que quieres decir, pero no parece haber ningĂşn EVB econĂłmico para mĂłdulos simcomâŚ
Send me a empty message on gmail, I will reply with a link (from Italy)âŚ
bamarcant (at)
I just ordered the module (aa) and hope it will arrive. I will then test the procedure described by bamarcant, hope it works. Likewise, I will then report. I will also try these different applications, esp. Xbee. Still new to this topic, but willing to learn (by doing). Will come back to this forumâŚ
Thanks so far!
Just curious, if you didnât have it already, why didnât you buy a LC29HEA, which can do both Rover and Base?
As I said, I came across this module (aa), when searching for a GNSS receiver as a base station. It doesnât need RTK, just the data for correction. It is advertised in this manner, and I couldnât find an answer, how to evaluate this statement. Thatâs why I asked here. After bamarcant posted his view and suggestions, I decided to give it a try. Why not 
For the rover side, Iâm indeed preferring a more sophisticated module, like the mentioned (ea) or (da).